sv3za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 9, 2006
Registration
No. 333-130634
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment Number 1
to
Form S-3
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
87-0543688 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
Organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
2100 Roosevelt Avenue
Springfield, Massachusetts 01104
(800) 331-0852
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including
Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive Offices) |
|
Michael F. Golden
President and Chief Executive Officer
Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation
2100 Roosevelt Avenue
Springfield, Massachusetts 01104
(800) 331-0852
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone
Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service) |
Copies to:
Robert S. Kant, Esq.
Elizabeth W. Fraser, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
2375 East Camelback Road
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
(602) 445-8000
The information in
this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not
sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and it is
not soliciting an offer to buy these securities, in any state
where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION. DATED
JANUARY 9, 2006.
PROSPECTUS
7,320,000 Shares
SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION
Common Stock
The stockholders of Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation
listed in this prospectus are offering for sale up to
7,320,000 shares of common stock. We expect that sales made
pursuant to this prospectus will be made
|
|
|
|
|
in brokers transactions; |
|
|
|
in transactions directly with market makers; or |
|
|
|
in privately negotiated sales or otherwise. |
We will not receive any of the proceeds of sales by the selling
stockholders.
The selling stockholders will determine when they will sell
their shares, and in all cases will sell their shares at the
current market price or at negotiated prices at the time of the
sale. Securities laws and SEC regulations may require the
selling stockholders to deliver this prospectus to purchasers
when they resell their shares of common stock.
Our common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange under
the symbol SWB. On January 6, 2006, the last
reported sale price of our common stock on the American Stock
Exchange was $3.93 per share.
See Risk Factors, on page 3, for a
discussion of certain risk factors that should be considered by
prospective purchasers of our common stock offered under this
prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this
Prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2006.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference the information we
file with it, which means that we can disclose important
information to you by referring you to those documents. The
information incorporated by reference is considered to be part
of this prospectus, and information we file later with the SEC
will automatically update and supersede this information.
We incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any
future filings made by us with the SEC under
Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14, or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 until the sale of all of the shares of
common stock that are part of this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended April 30, 2005; |
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended July 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended October 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
Definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed on
August 24, 2005; |
|
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
August 16, 2005; |
|
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
August 26, 2005; |
|
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
September 13, 2005; |
|
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
October 14, 2005; |
|
|
|
The description of our common stock contained in our
registration statement on
Form 10-SB filed
on January 19, 2000, including any amendment or report
filed for the purpose of updating that description; |
|
|
|
The description of our common stock contained in our
registration statement on
Form 8-A filed on
November 27, 2002, including any amendment or report filed
for the purpose of updating that description; and |
|
|
|
The description of our common stock contained in our
registration statement on
Form 8-A filed on
August 25, 2005, including any amendment or report filed
for the purpose of updating that description. |
Any statement contained in a document that is incorporated by
reference will be modified or superseded for all purposes to the
extent that a statement contained in this prospectus (or in any
other document that is subsequently filed with the SEC and
incorporated by reference) modifies or is contrary to that
previous statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will
not be deemed a part of this prospectus, except as so modified
or superseded.
You may request a copy of these filings at no cost by writing or
telephoning our corporate secretary at the following address and
telephone number: Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation,
2100 Roosevelt Avenue, Springfield, Massachusetts 01104,
telephone number (800) 331-0852.
i
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary does not contain all of the information
that may be important to purchasers of our common stock.
Prospective purchasers of common stock should carefully review
the detailed information and financial statements, including the
notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in or incorporated by
reference into this prospectus.
The Company
We are the largest manufacturer of handguns in the United States
and the largest U.S. exporter of handguns. We manufacturer
revolvers, pistols, and related products and accessories for
sale primarily to gun enthusiasts, collectors, hunters,
sportsmen, protection focused individuals, public safety
agencies and officers, and military agencies in the United
States and throughout the world. We have manufacturing
facilities in Springfield, Massachusetts and Houlton, Maine,
both of which are used primarily to manufacture our products. In
addition, we pursue opportunities to license our name and
trademarks to third parties for use in association with their
products and services. We plan to increase substantially our
product offerings and our licensing program to leverage the 150
plus year old Smith & Wesson name and
capitalize on the goodwill developed through our historic
American tradition by expanding consumer awareness of products
we produce or license in the safety, security, protection, and
sport markets.
Based upon 2004 reports by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol
Tobacco and Firearms, or ATF, we believe the domestic and export
non-military market is approximately $138 million for
revolvers and $467 million for pistols with our current
market share being approximately 38% and 10%, respectively; and
$670 million for rifles and $361 million of shotguns,
of which we currently have no market share.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to become a leader in the safety, security,
protection, and sport businesses. Key elements of our strategy
to achieve this objective are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
enhancing existing and introducing new products, |
|
|
|
entering new markets, |
|
|
|
enhancing manufacturing productivity, |
|
|
|
capitalizing on our brand name, |
|
|
|
necessary focused sales support, |
|
|
|
emphasizing customer satisfaction and loyalty, and |
|
|
|
pursuing strategic relationships and acquisitions. |
Our History
Our wholly owned subsidiary, Smith & Wesson Corp., was
founded in 1852 by Horace Smith and Daniel B. Wesson.
Mr. Wesson purchased Mr. Smiths interest in
1873. The Wesson family sold Smith & Wesson Corp. to
Bangor Punta Corp. in 1965. Lear Siegler Corporation purchased
Bangor Punta in 1984, thereby gaining ownership of
Smith & Wesson Corp. Forstmann Little & Co.
purchased Lear Siegler in 1986 and sold Smith & Wesson
Corp. shortly thereafter to Tomkins Corporation, an affiliate of
UK-based Tomkins PLC. We purchased Smith & Wesson Corp.
from Tomkins in May 2001 and changed our name to
Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation in February 2002.
1
Our Offices
We maintain our principal executive offices at 2100 Roosevelt
Avenue, Springfield, Massachusetts 01104. Our telephone number
is (800) 331-0852. Our website is located at
www.smith-wesson.com. Through our website, we make
available free of charge our annual reports on
Form 10-K, our
proxy statements, our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, our
current reports on
Form 8-K, and
amendments to any of them filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) under the Securities Exchange Act.
These documents are available as soon as reasonably practicable
after we electronically file those documents with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. We also post on our website the
charters of our Audit, Compensation, and Nominations and
Corporate Governance Committees; our Corporate Governance
Guidelines, our Code of Conduct, our Code of Ethics for the CEO
and Senior Financial Officers, and any amendments or waivers
thereto; and any other corporate governance materials
contemplated by the regulations of the SEC and the American
Stock Exchange. The documents are also available in print by
contacting our corporate secretary at our executive offices.
The Offering
|
|
|
Common Stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
7,320,000 shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will not receive any of the proceeds of sales of common stock
by the selling stockholders. We will receive net proceeds of
$6,535,440 upon the exercise of warrants held by the selling
stockholders. |
|
American Stock Exchange Symbol |
|
SWB |
2
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as
well as other information in this prospectus, in evaluating our
company and our business.
We are pursuing a new business strategy, which may not be
successful.
We have expanded our business objective to become a leader in
the business of safety, security, protection, and sport. This
objective is designed to enable us to increase our business
significantly and reduce our traditional dependence on handguns
in general, and revolvers in particular, in the sporting gun
market. Pursuing our strategy to achieve this objective will
require us to hire additional managerial, licensing,
manufacturing, marketing, and sales employees; to introduce new
products and services, which may include rifles, shotguns, and
other firearms products; to purchase additional machinery and
equipment; to expand our distribution channels; to expand our
customer base to include a leadership position in sales to law
enforcement agencies and the military; and to engage in
strategic alliances and acquisitions. We may not be able to
attract and retain the additional employees we require, to
introduce new products that attain significant market share, to
increase our law enforcement and military business, or to
penetrate successfully other safety, security, protection, and
sport markets.
We have a new management team.
Three of our principal operating executive officers have been
with our company for less than two years. We also have recently
hired a number of executives to lead several of our business
initiatives, such as licensing, governmental sales, and long
guns. As a result, our management team has not shown that they
can operate as a cohesive unit and has yet to prove that they
can successively operate our company.
We may be unable to continue to achieve gains in
manufacturing productivity.
A key element of our strategy is to enhance our manufacturing
productivity in terms of added capacity, increased daily
production quantities, lower machinery down time, extension of
machinery useful life, and enhanced product quality. From May
2004 until May 2005, we increased our daily production of
handguns from 922 to 1,417. We may not be able to continue the
increases in our manufacturing productivity.
Our migration to direct sales force may not be successful.
Historically, we sold our products in the U.S. sporting
goods channel primarily through independent sales
representatives that sold a number of products for other
companies. We are moving towards a direct sales force in the
U.S. sporting goods channel. This direct sales force may
not result in additional revenue.
We are currently involved in numerous lawsuits.
We are currently defending several lawsuits brought by various
cities and counties against us and numerous other manufacturers
and distributors arising out of the design, manufacture,
marketing, and distribution of handguns. In these lawsuits, the
various governments seek to recover substantial damages, as well
as various types of injunctive relief that, if granted, could
affect the future design, manufacture, marketing, and
distribution of handguns by the defendant manufacturers and
distributors. Although the defense of these lawsuits has been
successful to date, we cannot predict the outcome of these
lawsuits. Most of the cases do not specify the amount of the
damages sought. We believe, however, that the aggregate amount
that would be sought would exceed our accruals and insurance
coverage.
On October 26, 2005, President Bush signed the Protection
of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. The legislation is designed to
prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued
against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of
firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctions, or other relief
resulting from the misuse of their products by others. The
legislation by its terms would result in the dismissal against
us and preclude similar cases in the future. The legislation
does not preclude traditional product liability
3
actions. There have been constitutional and other challenges to
the legislation in some of the pending cases. We cannot predict
whether judges in existing proceedings will dismiss cases
currently pending before them. We could lose the benefits of the
legislation if any of the challenges to the legislation are
successful in one or more cases or generally.
Our settlement agreement harmed our business.
We believe we are the only gun manufacturer to enter into
settlement agreements with the city of Boston, the Boston Public
Health Commission, and the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, or HUD, relating to the manner of selling
handguns. Adverse publicity regarding the settlement agreements
resulted in a boycott by certain of our dealers and customers. A
number of dealers stopped carrying our products altogether, and
many long-time customers began purchasing products from our
competitors. Our settlement agreement with the Boston
authorities was vacated on April 8, 2002, and the HUD
settlement is not being enforced. However, we are still seeking
to recover fully from the consumer boycott.
The settlement agreement dated March 17, 2000 between us,
the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and HUD has not been
formally rescinded. The HUD settlement placed substantial
restrictions and obligations on the operation of our business,
including restrictions on the design, manufacture, marketing,
and distribution of our firearm products. It was subsequently
signed by two states and 11 cities and counties.
As of the signing of the HUD settlement, lawsuits had been filed
against us by nine of the 11 cities and counties that
signed the HUD settlement. Among other terms, the HUD settlement
provided that any city or county that was a party to the HUD
settlement and had a lawsuit pending against us would dismiss us
with prejudice from its lawsuit subject to a consent order. As
of August 10, 2005, none of the nine cities and counties
that signed the HUD settlement had dismissed us with prejudice
from its lawsuit subject to a consent order under the HUD
settlement.
We do not believe that the HUD settlement is legally binding for
numerous reasons, including that the lack of consideration
received by us for entering into the settlement. Our position
that the HUD settlement is not legally binding may not
ultimately prevail in any subsequent litigation. We do not
believe that the HUD settlement will be enforced, but have no
indication that the HUD settlement will be formally rescinded.
If enforced, these restrictions contained in the HUD Settlement
could substantially impair our ability to compete, particularly
since none of our competitors are subject to such restrictions.
Insurance is expensive and difficult to obtain.
Insurance coverage for firearms companies, including our
company, is expensive and relatively difficult to obtain. Our
insurance costs were approximately $3.3 million in the
fiscal year ended April 30, 2005. Our inability to obtain
insurance, the cost of insurance we obtain, or losses in excess
of our insurance coverage would have a negative impact on our
business, financial condition, and operating results.
The ongoing SEC investigation could result in additional
costs, monetary penalties, and injunctive relief.
The SEC is conducting an investigation to determine whether
there were violations of the federal securities laws in
connection with matters relating to the restatement of our
consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2002 and the first
three quarters of fiscal 2003. Although we have fully cooperated
with the SEC in this matter, the SEC may determine that we have
violated federal securities laws. We cannot predict when this
investigation will be completed or its outcome. If the SEC
determines that we violated federal securities laws, we may face
sanctions, including monetary penalties and injunctive relief.
In addition, we are incurring legal costs for our company as
well as a result of reimbursement obligations for several of our
current and former officers.
We face intense competition that could result in our losing
or failing to gain market share and suffering reduced
revenue.
We operate in intensely competitive markets that are
characterized by competition from major domestic and
international companies. This intense competition could result
in pricing pressures, lower sales, reduced margins, and lower
market share. Any movement away from high-quality, domestic
handguns to lower priced
4
or comparable foreign alternatives would harm our business. Some
of our competitors have greater financial, technical, marketing,
distribution, and other resources and, in certain cases, may
have lower cost structures than we possess and that afford them
competitive advantages. As a result, they may be able to devote
greater resources to the promotion and sale of products, to
negotiate lower prices on raw materials and components, to
deliver competitive products at lower prices, and to introduce
new products and respond to customer requirements more
effectively and quickly than we can.
Competition is based primarily on quality of products, product
innovation, price, and customer service and support. Product
image, quality, and innovation are the dominant competitive
factors in the firearms industry.
Our licensed products and non-gun products displayed in our
catalogs and sold by our licensees or us compete based on the
goodwill associated with our name. A decline in the perceived
quality of our handguns, a failure to design our products to
meet consumer preferences, or other circumstances reducing our
goodwill could significantly damage our ability to sell or
license those products. Our licensed products compete with
numerous other licensed and non-licensed products outside the
firearms market. We depend to a great extent on the success of
our independent licensees in distributing non-gun products. It
is uncertain whether the licensees we select will ultimately
succeed in their respective highly competitive markets.
Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of
factors, both within and outside our control. These factors
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our success in designing and introducing new products; |
|
|
|
our ability to predict the evolving requirements and desires of
our customers; |
|
|
|
the quality of our customer services; |
|
|
|
product introductions by our competitors; and |
|
|
|
foreign labor costs and currency fluctuations, which may cause a
foreign competitors products to be priced significantly
lower than our products. |
Our Springfield, Massachusetts facility is critical to our
success.
Our Springfield, Massachusetts facility is critical to our
success. We currently produce the majority of our handguns at
this facility. The facility also houses our principal research,
development, engineering, design, shipping, sales, accounting,
finance, and management functions. Any event that causes a
disruption of the operation of the facility for even a
relatively short period of time would reduce our ability to
produce and ship our products and to provide service to our
customers. We are in the process of making certain changes in
our manufacturing operations and modernizing our equipment as a
result of the age of the facility and certain inefficient
manufacturing processes in order to produce in a more efficient
and cost-efficient manner our anticipated volume of products. We
may not be successful in attaining increased production
efficiencies.
Shortages of components and materials may delay or reduce our
sales and increase our costs, thereby harming our operating
results.
The inability to obtain sufficient quantities of raw materials,
components, and other supplies from independent sources
necessary for the production of our products could result in
reduced or delayed sales or lost orders. Any delay in or loss of
sales could adversely impact our operating results. Many of the
materials used in the production of our products are available
only from a limited number of suppliers. In most cases, we do
not have long-term supply contracts with these suppliers. As a
result, we could be subject to increased costs, supply
interruptions, and difficulties in obtaining materials. Our
suppliers also may encounter difficulties or increased costs in
obtaining the materials necessary to produce their products that
we use in our products. The time lost in seeking and acquiring
new sources could hurt our net sales and profitability.
5
We must effectively manage our growth.
To remain competitive, we must make significant investments in
systems, equipment, and facilities. In addition, we may commit
significant funds to enhance our sales, marketing, and licensing
efforts in order to expand our business. As a result of the
increase in fixed costs and operating expenses, our failure to
increase sufficiently our net sales to offset these increased
costs would reduce our operating results.
The failure to manage our growth effectively could harm our
operations. We have substantially increased the number of our
manufacturing and design programs and plan to expand further the
number and diversity of our programs in the future. Our ability
to manage our planned growth effectively will require us to
|
|
|
|
|
enhance our operational, financial, and management systems; |
|
|
|
enhance our facilities and expand our equipment; and |
|
|
|
successfully hire, train, and motivate additional employees,
including additional personnel for our sales, marketing, and
licensing efforts. |
The expansion and diversification of our products and customer
base may result in increases in our overhead and selling
expenses. We also may be required to increase staffing and other
expenses as well as our expenditures on capital equipment and
leasehold improvements in order to meet the demand for our
products. Any increase in expenditures in anticipation of future
sales that do not materialize would reduce our profitability.
From time to time, we may seek additional equity or debt
financing to provide funds for the expansion of our business. We
cannot predict the timing or amount of any such financing
requirements at this time. If such financing is not available on
satisfactory terms, we may be unable to expand our business or
to develop new business at the rate desired and our operating
results may suffer. Debt financing increases expenses and must
be repaid regardless of operating results. Equity financing
could result in additional dilution to existing stockholders.
Our operating results may involve significant
fluctuations.
Various factors contribute to significant periodic and seasonal
fluctuations in our results of operations. These factors include
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the volume of customer orders relative to our capacity, |
|
|
|
the success of product introductions and market acceptance of
new products by us and our competitors, |
|
|
|
timing of expenditures in anticipation of future customer orders, |
|
|
|
effectiveness in managing manufacturing processes and costs, |
|
|
|
changes in cost and availability of labor and components, |
|
|
|
ability to manage inventory and inventory obsolescence, |
|
|
|
pricing and other competitive pressures, and |
|
|
|
changes or anticipated changes in economic conditions. |
Accordingly, you should not rely on the results of any period as
an indication of our future performance. If our operating
results fall below expectations of securities analysts or
investors, our stock price may decline.
Potential strategic alliances may not achieve their
objectives, and the failure to do so could impede our growth.
We anticipate that we will continue to enter into strategic
alliances. Among other matters, we continually explore strategic
alliances designed to expand our product offerings, enter new
markets, and improve our distribution channels. Any strategic
alliances may not achieve their intended objectives, and parties
to our
6
strategic alliances may not perform as contemplated. The failure
of these alliances may impede our ability to introduce new
products and enter new markets.
Any acquisitions that we undertake could be difficult to
integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value, and
harm our operating results.
We expect to review opportunities to acquire other businesses
that would complement or expand our current products, expand the
breadth of our markets, or otherwise offer growth opportunities.
While we have no current definitive agreements underway, we may
acquire businesses and products in the future. If we make any
future acquisitions, we could issue stock that would dilute
existing stockholders percentage ownership, incur
substantial debt, or assume contingent liabilities. Our
experience in acquiring other businesses is limited. Potential
acquisitions also involve numerous risks, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
problems assimilating the purchased operations or products, |
|
|
|
unanticipated costs associated with the acquisition, |
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from our core
businesses, |
|
|
|
adverse effects on existing business relationships with
suppliers and customers, |
|
|
|
risks associated with entering markets in which we have little
or no prior experience, and |
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of purchased organizations. |
We may not be successful in overcoming problems encountered in
connection with any acquisitions, and our inability to do so
could disrupt our operations and reduce our profitability.
Our inability to protect our intellectual property could
impair our competitive advantage, reduce our revenue, and
increase our costs.
Our success and ability to compete depend in part on our ability
to protect our intellectual property. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks,
confidentiality agreements, and other contractual provisions to
protect our intellectual property, but these measures may
provide only limited protection. Our failure to enforce and
protect our intellectual property rights or obtain the right to
use necessary intellectual property from third parties could
reduce our sales and increase our costs. In addition, the laws
of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights as
fully as do the laws of the United States.
Patents may not be issued for the patent applications that we
have filed or may file in the future. Our issued patents may be
challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, and claims of our
patents may not be of sufficient scope or strength, or issued in
the proper geographic regions, to provide meaningful protection
or any commercial advantage. We have registered certain of our
trademarks in the United States and other countries. We may be
unable to enforce existing or obtain new registrations of
principle or other trademarks in key markets. Failure to obtain
or enforce such registrations could compromise our ability to
protect fully our trademarks and brands and could increase the
risk of challenge from third parties to our use of our
trademarks and brands.
In the past, we did not consistently require our employees and
consultants to enter into confidentiality agreements, employment
agreements, or proprietary information and invention agreements.
Therefore, our former employees and consultants may try to claim
some ownership interest in our intellectual property and may use
our intellectual property competitively and without appropriate
limitations.
We may incur substantial expenses and devote management
resources in prosecuting others for their unauthorized use of
our intellectual property rights.
We may become involved in litigation regarding patents and other
intellectual property rights. Other companies, including our
competitors, may develop intellectual property that is similar
or superior to our intellectual property, duplicate our
intellectual property, or design around our patents and may have
or obtain patents or other proprietary rights that would
prevent, limit, or interfere with our ability to make, use, or
sell
7
our products. Effective intellectual property protection may be
unavailable or limited in some foreign countries in which we
sell products or from which competing products may be sold.
Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise use
aspects of our intellectual property and products that we regard
as proprietary. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights
in the United States or abroad may prove to be inadequate and
competitors may be able to develop independently similar
intellectual properties. If our intellectual property protection
is insufficient to protect our intellectual property rights, we
could face increased competition in the market for our products.
Should any of our competitors file patent applications or obtain
patents that claim inventions also claimed by us, we may choose
to participate in an interference proceeding to determine the
right to a patent for these inventions because our business
would be harmed if we fail to enforce and protect our
intellectual property rights. Even if the outcome is favorable,
this proceeding could result in substantial cost to us and
disrupt our business.
In the future, we also may need to file lawsuits to enforce our
intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, or
to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others. This litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful,
could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources,
which could result in a deterioration of our operating results.
We face risks associated with international trade and
currency exchange.
Political and economic conditions abroad may result in a
reduction of our foreign sales, as a result of the sale of our
products in approximately 50 countries and our importation of
firearms from Walther, which is based in Germany, and carbon and
stainless steel from suppliers in Great Britain and Italy,
including Osborn Steel Extrusion Limited in Great Britain, and
Calvi Special Steel Profiles S.P.A. and Stainless Bars S.A. in
Italy. Protectionist trade legislation in either the United
States or foreign countries, such as a change in the current
tariff structures, export or import compliance laws, or other
trade policies, could reduce our ability to sell our products in
foreign markets, the ability of foreign customers to purchase
our products, and our ability to import firearms from Walther
and other foreign suppliers. In addition, our international
sales of firearms are governed by various U.S. statutes and
regulations, including the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations of the U.S. Department of State. The Department
of State must issue a specific license for any international
sale, delineating the ultimate non-U.S. end-user of the
firearms as well as any intermediary consignees, such as
international freight forwarders. We also must comply with the
anti-boycott and embargo regulations of both the
U.S. Department of Commerce, pursuant to the Export
Administration Regulations, and the U.S. Department of the
Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control, pursuant to the
regulations of that Agency, and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act, as amended.
While we transact business predominantly in U.S. Dollars
and bill and collect most of our sales in U.S. Dollars, a
portion of our revenue results from goods that are purchased, in
whole or in part, from a European supplier, in Euros, thereby
exposing us to some foreign exchange fluctuations. In the
future, customers or suppliers increasingly may make or require
payments in
non-U.S. currencies,
such as the Euro.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could affect the
sale of our products or the cost of goods and operating margins
and could result in exchange losses. In addition, currency
devaluation can result in a loss to us if we hold deposits of
that currency. Hedging foreign currencies can be difficult,
especially if the currency is not freely traded. We cannot
predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our
operating results.
We face risks associated with international activities.
Our foreign sales of handguns and our importation of handguns
from Walther create a number of logistical and communications
challenges. These activities also expose us to various economic,
political, and other risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with local laws and regulatory requirements as well
as changes in those laws and requirements; |
|
|
|
transportation delays or interruptions and other effects of less
developed infrastructures; |
|
|
|
foreign exchange rate fluctuations; |
8
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on imports and exports; |
|
|
|
imposition of restrictions on currency conversion or the
transfer of funds; |
|
|
|
the possibility of appropriation of our assets without just
compensation; |
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign personnel and
diverse cultures; |
|
|
|
overlap of tax issues; |
|
|
|
tariffs and duties; |
|
|
|
possible employee turnover or labor unrest; |
|
|
|
the burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign
laws; and |
|
|
|
political or economic instability in countries in which we
conduct business, including possible terrorist acts. |
Changes in policies by the United States or foreign governments
resulting in, among other things, increased duties, higher
taxation, currency conversion limitations, restrictions on the
transfer or repatriation of funds, or limitations on imports or
exports also could harm our business. Any actions by foreign
countries to reverse policies that encourage foreign trade also
could reduce our operating results. In addition, U.S. trade
policies, such as most favored nation status and
trade preferences, could affect the attractiveness of our
services to our U.S. customers.
We are subject to national events.
We are subject to sales cycles beyond our control, which can be
driven by national events. The entire firearm industry has
experienced a surge in demand in the United States since and as
a direct result of the terrorist acts that occurred on
September 11, 2001. Americans are now more focused on their
personal security. Prior to September 11, 2001, we
manufactured approximately 10,200 handguns per month. We now are
manufacturing approximately 28,000 handguns per month. The
renewed patriotism of the American consumer coupled with the
return of our company to American ownership, the change in
administrations in Washington, D.C. to one favorably
disposed to protecting the rights of the Second Amendment, and
the lessening of various dealer and consumer boycotts against
purchasing our products are also contributing factors to the
demand for our handguns. We cannot predict how long these and
similar factors will increase the demand for our products. Any
actual or perceived reduction in the threat of terrorism or
additional governmental controls on the sale or use of handguns
could reduce the demand for our products.
We may incur higher employee medical costs in the future.
We are self-insured for our employee medical plan. The average
age of our workforce is 48 years. More than 10% of our
employees are over age 60. While our medical costs in
recent years have generally increased at the same level as the
regional average, the age of our workforce could result in
higher than anticipated medical claims, resulting in an increase
in our costs beyond what we have experienced. We do have stop
loss coverage in place for catastrophic events, but the
aggregate impact may have an effect on profitability.
Our business is seasonal with our July fiscal quarters being
our weakest quarter.
Our business is seasonal. Historically, our fiscal quarter
ending July 31 has been our weakest quarter. We believe
that this downturn in sales occurs primarily as a result of
customers pursuing other sporting activities outdoors with the
arrival of more temperate weather and the reduced disposable
income of our customers after using their tax refunds for
purchases in March and April, historically our strongest months.
Generally, we do not experience any significant increase in
demand until immediately prior to the opening of hunting season
in the fall. This decline in net sales may result in decreases
in our stock price during the summer months.
We are subject to extensive regulation.
Our business, as well as the business of all producers and
marketers of firearms and firearms parts, is subject to numerous
federal, state, and local laws and governmental regulations and
protocols, including the National Firearms Act, the Federal
Firearms Act, and the Gun Control Act of 1968. These laws
generally prohibit the private ownership of fully automatic
weapons and place certain restrictions on the interstate sale
9
of firearms unless certain licenses are obtained. We do not
manufacture fully automatic weapons, other than for the law
enforcement market, and hold all necessary licenses under these
federal laws. From time to time, congressional committees
consider proposed bills and various states enact laws relating
to the regulation of firearms. These proposed bills and enacted
state laws generally seek either to restrict or ban the sale
and, in some cases, the ownership of various types of firearms.
We believe we are in compliance with all such laws applicable to
us and hold all necessary licenses. The regulation of firearms
could become more restrictive in the future or any such
restriction would harm our business. In June 2004, we recalled
Walter P22 pistols sold in California in order to retrofit them
to comply with California law.
Environmental laws and regulations may impact our
business.
We are subject to numerous federal, state, and local laws that
regulate or otherwise relate to the protection of the
environment, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act,
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act, or CERCLA, and the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA.
CERCLA, RCRA, and related state laws subject us to the potential
obligation to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of
the disposal or release of certain pollutants at our
manufacturing facilities and at third-party or formerly owned
sites at which contaminants generated by us may be located. This
requires us to make expenditures of both a capital and expense
nature.
In our efforts to satisfy our environmental responsibilities and
to comply with environmental laws and regulations, we maintain
policies relating to the environmental standards of performance
for our operations, and conduct programs to monitor compliance
with various environmental regulations. However, in the normal
course of our manufacturing operations, we may become subject to
governmental proceedings and orders pertaining to waste
disposal, air emissions, and water discharges into the
environment. We believe that we are generally in compliance with
applicable environmental regulations.
On February 25, 2003, we sold approximately 85 acres
of company-owned property in the city of Springfield,
Massachusetts to the Springfield Redevelopment Authority, or
SRA. This property is excess land adjacent to our manufacturing
and office facility. The 85 acres includes three of our
five previously disclosed release areas that have identified
soil and groundwater contamination under the Massachusetts
Department of Environmental Protections voluntary
remediation program, referred to as the Massachusetts
Contingency Plan or MCP, specifically the South Field, West
Field, and Fire Pond. This property was acquired by the SRA as a
defined Brownfield under CERCLA. We believe that the
SRA plans to create a light industrial and other commercial use
development park on the property. The SRA, with the support of
the city of Springfield, has received governmental
Brownfield grants or loans to facilitate the
remediation and development of the property. The remediation of
the property was completed during the quarter ended
July 31, 2005. Consequently, we have reduced the reserve
related to the property. This adjustment totaled approximately
$3.1 million and was included as a reduction of operating
expenses for the quarter ended July 31, 2005.
As of July 31, 2005, we had reserves of approximately
$700,000 for environmental matters.
We may not have identified all existing contamination on our
properties or that our operations will not cause contamination
in the future. As a result, we could incur additional material
costs to clean up contamination. We will periodically review the
probable and reasonably estimable environmental costs in order
to update the environmental reserves.
Furthermore, it is not possible to predict with certainty the
impact on us of future environmental compliance requirements or
of the cost of resolution of future environmental proceedings
and claims, in part because the scope of the remedies that may
be required is not certain, liability under federal
environmental laws is joint and several in nature, and
environmental laws and regulations are subject to modification
and changes in interpretation. Additional or changing
environmental regulation may become burdensome in the future.
The ownership of our common stock is concentrated.
Colton R. Melby and Mitchell A. Saltz, each of whom is a
director and former executive officer of our company,
beneficially own approximately 14.8% and 9.6%, respectively, of
our common stock. These
10
stockholders, acting together, would be able to influence
significantly all matters requiring approval by our
stockholders, including the election of directors. These
individuals may take certain actions even if other stockholders
oppose them. This concentration of ownership might also have the
effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our
company even if such a change were in the best interests of
other stockholders.
Certain provisions of our articles of incorporation and
bylaws and Nevada law make it more difficult for a third party
to acquire us and make a takeover more difficult to complete,
even if such a transaction were in the stockholders
interest or might result in a premium over the market price for
the shares held by our stockholders.
Our articles of incorporation, bylaws, and the Nevada General
Corporation Law contain provisions that may have the effect of
making more difficult or delaying attempts by others to obtain
control of our company, even when these attempts may be in the
best interests of our stockholders.
We also are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of the
Nevada General Corporation Law, which prohibits us from engaging
in a business combination with an interested
stockholder unless the business combination is approved in
a prescribed manner and prohibits the voting of shares held by
persons acquiring certain numbers of shares without obtaining
requisite approval. The statutes have the effect of making it
more difficult to effect a change in control of a Nevada company.
Our stockholders rights plan may have the effect of
deferring, delaying, or preventing a change in control.
Our Stockholders Rights Plan may have the effect of
deterring, delaying, or preventing a change in control that
might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. In
general and subject to certain exceptions as to existing major
stockholders, stock purchase rights issued under the Plan become
exercisable when a person or group acquires 15% or more of our
common stock or a tender offer or exchange offer of 15% or more
of our common stock is announced or commenced. After any such
event, our other stockholders may purchase additional shares of
our common stock at 50% of the then-current market price. The
rights will cause substantial dilution to a person or group that
attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our board of
directors. The rights should not interfere with any merger or
other business combination approved by our board of directors
since the rights may be redeemed by us at $0.01 per stock
purchase right at any time before any person or group acquires
15% or more of our outstanding common stock. The rights expire
in August 2015.
The issuance of additional common stock in the future,
including shares that we may issue pursuant to option grants,
may result in dilution in the net tangible book value per share
of our common stock.
Our Board of Directors has the legal power and authority to
determine the terms of an offering of shares of our capital
stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for these
shares, to the extent of our shares of authorized and unissued
capital stock.
Sale of substantial number of shares that are eligible for
sale could result in a lower price of our common stock.
As of October 31, 2005, there were outstanding
39,206,647 shares of our common stock. Except for the
shares covered by the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part, substantially all of these shares are
freely tradable without restriction or further registration
under the securities laws, unless held by an
affiliate of our company, as that term is
defined in Rule 144 under the securities laws. Shares held
by affiliates of our company, which generally include our
directors, officers, and certain principal stockholders, are
subject to the resale limitations of Rule 144 described
below.
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, any
person, or persons whose shares are aggregated for purposes of
Rule 144, who beneficially owns restricted securities with
respect to which at least one year has elapsed since the later
of the date the shares were acquired from us, or from an
affiliate of ours, is entitled to sell within any three-month
period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of 1%
of the then outstanding shares of our common stock and the
average weekly trading volume in common stock during the four
calendar weeks preceding such sale. Sales under Rule 144
also are subject to certain
manner-of-sale
11
provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of
current public information about us. Rule 701, as currently
in effect, permits our employees, officers, directors, and
consultants who purchase shares pursuant to a written
compensatory plan or contract to resell these shares in reliance
upon Rule 144, but without compliance with specific
restrictions. Rule 701 provides that affiliates may sell
their Rule 701 shares under Rule 144 without
complying with the holding period requirement and that
non-affiliates may sell their shares in reliance on
Rule 144 without complying with the holding period, public
information, volume limitation, or notice provisions of
Rule 144. A person who is not an affiliate, who has not
been an affiliate within three months prior to sale, and who
beneficially owns restricted securities with respect to which at
least two years have elapsed since the later of the date the
shares were acquired from us, or from an affiliate of ours, is
entitled to sell such shares under Rule 144(k) without
regard to any of the volume limitations or other requirements
described above. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock in
the public market could result in lower prevailing market prices.
As of October 31, 2005, we had outstanding options to
purchase 2,912,667 shares of common stock under our
stock option plans and we had issued 628,389 of the
10,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance
under our employee stock purchase plan. As of October 31,
2005, we also had outstanding warrants to
purchase 1,320,000 shares of common stock. We have
registered for offer and sale the shares of common stock that
are reserved for issuance pursuant to our stock option plans and
available for issuance pursuant to the employee stock purchase
plan as well as the shares underlying the warrants. Shares
covered by such registration statements upon the exercise of
stock options or warrants or pursuant to the employee stock
purchase plan generally will be eligible for sale in the public
market, except that affiliates will continue to be subject to
volume limitations and other requirements of Rule 144. The
issuance or sale of such shares could depress the market price
of our common stock.
The market price of our common stock could be subject to wide
fluctuations as a result of many factors.
Many factors could affect the trading price of our common stock,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
variations in our operating results; |
|
|
|
the relatively small public float of our common stock; |
|
|
|
introductions of new products by us or our competitors; |
|
|
|
the success of our distributors; |
|
|
|
changes in the estimates of our operating performance or changes
in recommendations by any securities analysts that follow our
stock; |
|
|
|
general economic, political, and market conditions; |
|
|
|
governmental policies and regulations; |
|
|
|
the performance of the firearms industry in general; and |
|
|
|
factors relating to suppliers and competitors. |
In addition, market demand for small-capitalization stocks, and
price and volume fluctuations in the stock market unrelated to
our performance, could result in significant fluctuations in
market price of our common stock. The performance of our common
stock could reduce our ability to raise equity in the public
markets and harm the growth of our business.
We do not pay cash dividends.
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. Moreover, financial covenants under certain of our
credit facilities restrict our ability to pay dividends.
12
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements and information contained in this prospectus
and the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus
that are not purely historical facts are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws.
Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our
expectations, anticipation,
intentions, beliefs, or
strategies regarding the future. Forward-looking
statements also include statements regarding revenue, margins,
expenses, and earnings analysis for fiscal 2005 and thereafter;
future products or product development; our product development
strategies; beliefs regarding product performance; the success
of particular product or marketing programs; and liquidity and
anticipated cash needs and availability. Accordingly, our actual
results may differ, perhaps materially, from those expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause our actual results to differ materially from the
forward-looking statements include those factors discussed above
in Risk Factors.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any of the proceeds from sales of shares of
common stock by the selling stockholders. We will receive net
proceeds of $6,535,440 in the event that the warrants to
purchase 1,320,000 shares are exercised in full.
THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT
On September 12, 2005, we completed the sale of an
aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock and
warrants to purchase an additional 1,200,000 shares of our
common stock. The sale was made to institutional investors in
reliance upon the exemption from registration requirements under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Rule 506 of Regulation D under such Act. We received
an aggregate of $26,160,000 cash for the sale of the shares. We
agreed to promptly file a registration statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission to register the shares and
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants.
The exercise price for the warrants is $5.33 per share. The
warrants are exercisable beginning on March 12, 2006 (the
Trigger Date) and expire on the later to occur of
(i) the 180th trading day following the date the
Registration Statement is declared effective by the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and (ii) the 210th day
following the Closing Date. The number of shares issuable upon
exercise of the warrants is subject to adjustment for any stock
dividends, stock splits or distributions by us, or upon any
merger or consolidation or sale of assets of our company, tender
or exchange offer for our companys common stock, or a
reclassification of our common stock.
Of the proceeds from the private placement, we used $23,950,701
to repurchase outstanding warrants to purchase our common stock
held by Mitchell A. Saltz and Robert L. Scott, who are directors
of our Company. The balance of the net proceeds was used for
general working capital. We also entered into an agreement with
Messrs. Saltz, Scott, and Colton R. Melby, another director
of our company, pursuant to which Messrs. Saltz, Scott, and
Melby have agreed to sell to us an aggregate of
1,200,000 shares of the Companys common stock if we
so request, at a price per share of $5.33. Our right to purchase
the shares terminates on the 10th day following the
expiration of the warrants issued in the private placement.
We also issued a warrant to purchase 120,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $4.36 to the placement
agent for services rendered in connection with the private
placement. This warrant is substantially the same as the
warrants issued to the investors except that it became
exercisable on March 12, 2006 and expires on
September 12, 2010.
The warrants owned by Messrs. Saltz and Scott and the
shares owned by Mr. Melby were acquired in connection with
our purchase in May 2001 of all the outstanding common stock of
Smith & Wesson Corp. Smith & Wesson Corp. is
our principal operating subsidiary.
13
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
This prospectus relates to the resale from time to time of up to
a total of 7,320,000 shares of our common stock by the
selling stockholders, which shares are comprised of the
6,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,200,000 shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants purchased
in the private placement, and 120,000 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of warrants received by
SG Cowen & Co., LLC (SG Cowen) as
compensation for its services as placement agent in the private
placement.
The following table sets forth (1) the name of the selling
stockholders, (2) the number of shares of common stock
beneficially owned by such selling stockholders that may be
offered for the account of such selling stockholders under this
prospectus, and (3) the number of shares of common stock
beneficially owned by such selling stockholders upon completion
of this offering. Such information was obtained from the selling
stockholders but has not been independently verified by us. The
term selling stockholders includes the person listed
below and his respective transferees, pledgees, donees, or other
successors. The selling stockholders have had no material
relationship with us during the past three years. To our
knowledge, there currently are no agreements, arrangements, or
understandings with respect to the sale of any shares of our
common stock. As to shares being sold for the account of
SG Cowen, SG Cowen is an underwriter. SG Cowen is
not underwriting the resale of any other shares. SG Cowen
received its warrants in the ordinary course of business and, at
the time it received the warrants, SG Cowen had no
agreements or understandings to distribute such securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
|
Owned Prior to | |
|
|
|
Owned After | |
|
|
Offering(1) | |
|
Shares Being | |
|
Offering(1)(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
Registered | |
|
| |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
for Sale(2) | |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Amatis Limited(3)
|
|
|
480,000 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
480,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ventures International(4)
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cranshire Capital, L.P.(5)
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DBZ Acquisition Partners II, LLC(6)
|
|
|
324,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
324,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.(7)
|
|
|
252,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
252,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omicron Master Trust(8)
|
|
|
324,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
324,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portside Growth and Opportunity Fund(9)
|
|
|
840,000 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
840,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smithfield Fiduciary LLC(10)
|
|
|
2,760,000 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
2,760,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC f/b/o/ Kings Road Investments Ltd.(11)
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG Cowen & Co., LLC(12)
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Except as otherwise indicated, each selling stockholder named in
the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to
all shares of common stock beneficially owned by it. The numbers
and percentages shown include (a) the shares of common
stock actually owned as of October 31, 2005, and
(b) the shares of common stock which the person or group
had the right to acquire upon the exercise of warrants held by
such selling stockholder on October 31, 2005. In
calculating the percentage of ownership, all shares of common
stock that the identified person or group had the right to
acquire upon the exercise of warrants held by such selling
stockholder are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage of the shares of common stock owned by
such person or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for
the purpose of computing the percentage of the shares of common
stock owned by any other person or group. |
|
|
(2) |
We do not know the extent to which the selling stockholders will
sell any of the securities being registered hereby. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes 80,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant,
which warrant becomes exercisable on or after March 12,
2006. Amaranth Advisors L.L.C., the trading advisor for Amatis
Limited, exercises voting and/or dispositive power with respect
to the securities held by this selling stockholder. Nicholas |
14
|
|
|
|
|
M. Maounis is the managing member of Amaranth Advisors L.L.C.
This selling stockholder has identified itself as an affiliate
of a broker-dealer. This selling securityholder has represented
to us that it acquired the securities being resold pursuant to
this prospectus in the ordinary course of business and, at the
time of purchase of the securities, the selling securityholder
had no agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly,
with any person to distribute such securities. Each of Amaranth
Securities L.L.C. and Amaranth Global Securities Inc. is a
broker-dealer registered pursuant to Section 15(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is a member of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (the NASD).
Each such broker-dealer may be deemed to be an affiliate of the
selling securityholder. Neither of such broker-dealers, however,
is authorized by the NASD to engage in securities offerings
either as an underwriter or as a selling group participant and
neither of such broker-dealers actually engages in any such
activity. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a
warrant, which warrant becomes exercisable on or after
March 12, 2006. Heights Capital Management, Inc., the
authorized agent for this selling stockholder, has discretionary
authority to vote and dispose of the securities held by this
selling stockholder. This selling stockholder has identified
itself as an affiliate of a broker-dealer. This selling
securityholder has represented to us that it acquired the
securities being resold pursuant to this prospectus in the
ordinary course of business and, at the time of purchase of the
securities, the selling securityholder had no agreements or
understandings, directly or indirectly, with any person to
distribute such securities. |
|
|
(5) |
Includes 20,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant,
which warrant becomes exercisable on or after March 12,
2006. Mr. Mitchell P. Kopin, President of Downsview
Capital, Inc., the General Partner of this selling stockholder,
ha sole voting and dispositive power over the shares held by
this selling stockholder. |
|
|
(6) |
Includes 54,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant,
which warrant becomes exercisable on or after March 12,
2006. D.B. Zwirn & co., L.P. is the trading manager of
this selling stockholder and consequently has voting control and
investment discretion over the securities held by this selling
stockholder. Daniel B. Zwirn is the managing member of and
thereby controls Zwirn Holdings, LLC, which in turn is the
managing member of and thereby controls DBZ GP, LLC, which in
turn is the general partner of and thereby controls D.B.
Zwirn & Co., L.P. |
|
|
(7) |
Includes 42,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant,
which warrant becomes exercisable on or after March 12,
2006. Mr. Joshua Silverman has voting and investment
control over the shares held by this selling stockholder.
Mr. Silverman disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. |
|
|
(8) |
Includes 54,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant,
which warrant becomes exercisable on or after March 12,
2006. Omicron Capital, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
(Omicron Capital), serves as investment manager to
Omicron Master Trust, a trust formed under the laws of Bermuda
(Omicron). Omicron Capital, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (OCI), serves as general partner of
Omicron Capital, and Winchester Global Trust Company Limited
(Winchester) serves as the trustee of Omicron. By
reason of such relationships, Omicron Capital and OCI may be
deemed to share dispositive power over the shares held by
Omicron, and Winchester may be deemed to share voting and
dispositive power over the shares held by Omicron. Omicron
Capital, OCI, and Winchester disclaim beneficial ownership of
such shares. Omicron Capital has delegated authority from the
board of directors of Winchester regarding the portfolio
management decisions with respect to the shares held by Omicron
and, as of September 28, 2005, Mr. Olivier H. Morali
and Mr. Bruce T. Bernstein, officers of OCI, have delegated
authority from the board of directors of OCI regarding the
portfolio management decisions of Omicron Capital with respect
to the shares held by Omicron. By reason of such delegated
authority, Messrs. Morali and Bernstein may be deemed to
share dispositive power over the shares held by Omicron.
Messrs. Morali and Bernstein disclaim beneficial ownership
of such shares and neither of such persons have the legal right
to maintain such delegated authority. No other person has sole
or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the shares
held by Omicron, as those terms are used for purposes under
Regulation 13D-G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Omicron and Winchester are not affiliates
of one another, as that term is used for purposes of the
Securities |
15
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or of any other person named
in this prospectus as a selling stockholder. No person or
group (as that term is used in Section 13(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
SECs Regulation 13D-G) controls Omicron and
Winchester. |
|
|
(9) |
Includes 140,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a
warrant, which warrant becomes exercisable on or after
March 12, 2006. Ramius Capital Group, LLC (Ramius
Capital) is the investment adviser of this selling
stockholder and consequently has voting control and investment
discretion over securities held by this selling stockholder.
Ramius Capital disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held
by this selling stockholder. Peter A. Cohen, Morgan B. Stark,
Thomas W. Strauss, and Jeffrey M. Solomon are the sole managing
members of C4S & Co., LLC, the sole managing member of
Ramius Capital. As a result, Messrs. Cohen, Stark, Strauss,
and Solomon may be considered beneficial owners of any shares
deemed to be beneficially owned by Ramius Capital.
Messrs. Cohen, Stark, Strauss, and Solomon disclaim
beneficial ownership of these shares. This selling
securityholder has identified itself as an affiliate of a
broker-dealer. This selling securityholder has represented to us
that it acquired the securities being resold pursuant to this
prospectus in the ordinary course of business and, at the time
of purchase of the securities, the selling securityholder had no
agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any
person to distribute such securities. Ramius Securities, LLC, an
NASD member, is an affiliate of Ramius Capital. However, Ramius
Securities, LLC will not sell any shares purchased in this
offering by Portside Growth and Opportunity Fund and will
receive no compensation whatsoever in connection with sales of
shares purchased in this transaction. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 460,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a
warrant, which warrant becomes exercisable on or after
March 12, 2006. Highbridge Capital Management, LLC
(Highbridge) is the trading manager of this selling
stockholder and consequently has voting control and investment
discretion over the shares held by this selling stockholder.
Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca control Highbridge. Each of
Highbridge, Glenn Dubin, and Henry Swieca disclaims beneficial
ownership of the shares held by this selling stockholder. |
|
(11) |
Includes 250,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a
warrant, which warrant becomes exercisable on or after
March 12, 2006. Kings Road Investments Ltd. (Kings
Road) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Polygon Global
Opportunities Master Fund (Master Fund). Polygon
Investment Partners LLP, Polygon Investment Partners LP, and
Polygon Investments Ltd. (the Investment Managers),
the Master Fund, Alexander Jackson, Reade Griffith, and Paddy
Dear share voting and dispositive power over the securities held
by Kings Road. Alexander Jackson, Reade Griffith, and Paddy Dear
control the Investment Managers. The Investment Managers,
Alexander Jackson, Reade Griffith, and Paddy Dear disclaim
beneficial ownership of the securities held by Kings Road. |
|
(12) |
Represents shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant, which
warrant becomes exercisable on or after March 12, 2006.
SG Cowen & Co., LLC is a registered broker-dealer
and, accordingly, it is an underwriter within the
meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act. See
Plan of Distribution. |
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The selling stockholders may, from time to time, sell any or all
of their shares of common stock on any stock exchange, market or
trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private
transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices.
The selling stockholders may use any one or more of the
following methods when selling shares:
|
|
|
|
|
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the
broker-dealer solicits purchasers; |
|
|
|
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the
shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the
block as principal to facilitate the transaction; |
|
|
|
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the
broker-dealer for its account; |
|
|
|
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the
applicable exchange; |
|
|
|
privately negotiated transactions; |
16
|
|
|
|
|
short sales; |
|
|
|
broker-dealers may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a
specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share; |
|
|
|
a combination of any such methods of sale; and |
|
|
|
any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law. |
The selling stockholders may also sell shares under
Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather
than under this prospectus.
The selling stockholders may also engage in short sales against
the box, puts and calls and other transactions in our securities
or derivatives of our securities and may sell or deliver shares
in connection with these trades.
Broker-dealers engaged by the selling stockholders may arrange
for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales.
Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the
selling stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for
the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be
negotiated. The selling stockholders do not expect these
commissions and discounts to exceed what is customary in the
types of transactions involved. Any profits on the resale of
shares of common stock by a broker-dealer acting as principal
might be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions
under the Securities Act. Discounts, concessions, commissions
and similar selling expenses, if any, attributable to the sale
of shares will be borne by a selling stockholder. The selling
stockholders may agree to indemnify any agent, dealer or
broker-dealer that participates in transactions involving sales
of the shares if liabilities are imposed on that person under
the Securities Act. In connection with sales of the shares of
common stock or otherwise, the selling stockholders may enter
into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may in turn
engage in short sales of the shares of common stock in the
course of hedging in positions they assume. The selling
stockholders may also sell shares of common stock short and
deliver shares of common stock covered by this prospectus to
close out short positions and to return borrowed shares in
connection with such short sales. The selling stockholders may
also loan or pledge shares of common stock to broker-dealers
that in turn may sell such shares.
The selling stockholders may from time to time pledge or grant a
security interest in some or all of the shares of common stock
owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their
secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer
and sell the shares of common stock from time to time under this
prospectus after we have filed an amendment to this prospectus
under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the
Securities Act amending the list of selling stockholders to
include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest
as selling stockholders under this prospectus. We also will file
a post-effective amendment if an underwriter is used in the sale
of the shares, which discloses the name of the underwriter and
discusses the material terms of any agreement with the
underwriter.
The selling stockholders also may transfer the shares of common
stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferees,
pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling
beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus and may sell
the shares of common stock from time to time under this
prospectus after we have filed an amendment to this prospectus
under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the
Securities Act amending the list of selling stockholders to
include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest
as selling stockholders under this prospectus.
The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that
are involved in selling the shares of common stock may be deemed
to be underwriters within the meaning of the
Securities Act in connection with such sales. Any selling
stockholders that are broker-dealers or affiliates of
broker-dealers will be deemed to be underwriters
within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with any
sales of the shares by them. In such event, any commissions
received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the
resale of the shares of common stock purchased by them may be
deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the
Securities Act. Of the selling stockholders, SG Cowen is a
broker-dealer.
We are required to pay all fees and expenses incident to the
registration of the shares of common stock, including $35,000 of
fees and disbursements of counsel to the selling stockholders.
We have agreed to
17
indemnify the selling stockholders against certain losses,
claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act.
The selling stockholders have advised us that they have not
entered into any agreements, understandings or arrangements with
any underwriters or broker-dealers regarding the sale of their
shares of common stock, nor is there an underwriter or
coordinating broker acting in connection with a proposed sale of
shares of common stock by any selling stockholder. If we are
notified by any selling stockholder that any material
arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the
sale of shares of common stock, if required, we will file a
supplement to this prospectus. If the selling stockholders use
this prospectus for any sale of the shares of common stock, they
will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the
Securities Act.
The anti-manipulation rules of Regulation M under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may apply to sales of our common
stock and activities of the selling stockholders.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will
be passed upon for us by Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Phoenix,
Arizona.
EXPERTS
The financial statements incorporated in this prospectus by
reference to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended April 30, 2005 have been so incorporated in
reliance on the report (which contains an explanatory paragraph
relating to the Companys restatement of its financial
statements as described in Note 24 to the financial
statements) of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of
said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed a registration statement on
Form S-3 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the common stock
offered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all
of the information set forth in the registration statement. For
further information with respect to our company and the common
stock offered by this prospectus as well as the exhibits and
schedules to the registration statement, we refer you to the
registration statement, those exhibits and schedules, and to the
information incorporated by reference in this prospectus.
Anyone may inspect a copy of the registration statement and our
other filings without charge at the public reference facility
maintained by the SEC in its public reference room,
Room 1580, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. Copies of all or any part of the registration statement
and our other filings may be obtained from that facility upon
payment of the prescribed fees. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the public reference room by
calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC
maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports,
proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC.
18
We
have not authorized any person to give any information or to
make any representation not contained in this prospectus, and,
if given or made, such information or representation must not be
relied upon as having been authorized by or on behalf of us.
This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy any shares covered by this
prospectus in any jurisdiction or to any person to whom it is
unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. The information in
this prospectus is current as of its date. Neither the delivery
of this prospectus nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any
circumstances, imply that there has been no change in the
affairs of our company or that the information contained in this
prospectus is correct as of any subsequent date.
7,320,000 Shares
Smith & Wesson
Holding Corporation
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
,
2006
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 14. |
Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution. |
The following table sets forth the expenses payable by the
Registrant in connection with the offering described in the
Registration Statement. We are paying all of the selling
stockholders expenses related to this offering, except
that the selling securityholders will pay any applicable
brokers commissions and expenses. All of the amounts shown
are estimates except for the registration fee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
|
to Be | |
|
|
Paid | |
|
|
| |
SEC Registration Fee
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Accountants Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
Legal Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Printing and Engraving Expenses
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Miscellaneous Fees
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
34,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers. |
Our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide
that we will indemnify and advance expenses, to the fullest
extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, to
each person who is or was a director or officer of our company,
or who serves or served any other enterprise or organization at
the request of our company (an indemnitee).
Under Delaware law, to the extent that an indemnitee is
successful on the merits in defense of a suit or proceeding
brought against him or her by reason of the fact that he or she
is or was a director, officer, or agent of our company, or
serves or served any other enterprise or organization at the
request of our company, we shall indemnify him or her against
expenses (including attorneys fees) actually and
reasonably incurred in connection with such action.
If unsuccessful in defense of a third-party civil suit or a
criminal suit, or if such a suit is settled, an indemnitee may
be indemnified under Delaware law against both
(1) expenses, including attorneys fees, and
(2) judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement if he
or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably
believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of our
company, and, with respect to any criminal action, had no
reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
If unsuccessful in defense of a suit brought by or in the right
of our company, where the suit is settled, an indemnitee may be
indemnified under Delaware law only against expenses (including
attorneys fees) actually and reasonably incurred in the
defense or settlement of the suit if he or she acted in good
faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or
not opposed to, the best interests of our company except that if
the indemnitee is adjudged to be liable for negligence or
misconduct in the performance of his or her duty to our company,
he or she cannot be made whole even for expenses unless a court
determines that he or she is fully and reasonably entitled to
indemnification for such expenses.
Also under Delaware law, expenses incurred by an officer or
director in defending a civil or criminal action, suit, or
proceeding may be paid by the registrant in advance of the final
disposition of the suit, action, or proceeding upon receipt of
an undertaking by or on behalf of the officer or director to
repay such amount if it is ultimately determined that he or she
is not entitled to be indemnified by our company. We may also
advance expenses incurred by other employees and agents of our
company upon such terms and conditions, if any, that the Board
of Directors of the registrant deems appropriate.
II-1
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.13 |
|
Form of Warrant issued in connection with the Securities
Purchase Agreement forming Exhibit 10.52.(1) |
|
4 |
.14 |
|
Form of Warrant issued to placement agent in connection with the
Securities Purchase Agreement forming Exhibit 10.52.(1) |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
|
10 |
.52 |
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among the Registrant and
the investors named therein dated as of September 7,
2005.(1) |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Greenberg Traurig, LLP (contained in Exhibit 5.1) |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP(2) |
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney of Directors and Executive Officers (included
on the Signature Page of the Registration Statement)(2) |
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on September 13, 2005. |
|
|
(2) |
Previously Filed |
|
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
|
|
|
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement: |
|
|
|
(i) To include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; |
|
|
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price represent no more than 20 percent change in the
maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the
Calculation of Registration Fee table in the
effective registration statement. |
|
|
(iii) To include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement; |
|
|
|
provided, however, that paragraphs (1)(i), (ii)
and (iii) do not apply if the information required to be
included in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is
contained in reports filed with or furnished to the Commission
by the registrant pursuant to section 13 or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that
are incorporated by reference into the registration statement,
or is contained in a form of prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) that is part of the registration statement. |
|
|
|
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof. |
II-2
|
|
|
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering. |
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes
of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933,
each filing of the registrants annual report pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit
plans annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by
reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a
new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
The undersigned hereby undertakes that:
|
|
|
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective. |
|
|
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers
and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-3 and has
duly caused this amendment no. 1 to the registration
statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Springfield,
Massachusetts, on this 9th day of January, 2006.
|
|
|
SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael F. Golden |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Golden |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
amendment no. 1 to the Registration Statement has been
signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Position |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Barry M. Monheit*
Barry M. Monheit |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
/s/ Robert L. Scott*
Robert L. Scott |
|
Vice Chairman of the Board |
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
/s/ Michael F. Golden
Michael F. Golden |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Chief
Executive Officer) |
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
/s/ John A. Kelly
John A. Kelly |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer) |
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
/s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan*
Jeffrey D. Buchanan |
|
Director |
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
/s/ John B. Furman*
John B. Furman |
|
Director |
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
/s/ Colton R. Melby*
Colton R. Melby |
|
Director |
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
James J. Minder |
|
Director |
|
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Position |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mitchell A. Saltz*
Mitchell A. Saltz |
|
Director |
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
/s/ I. Marie Wadecki*
I. Marie Wadecki |
|
Director |
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
*By: |
|
Michael F. Golden
Attorney-in-fact |
|
|
|
|
II-5
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.13 |
|
Form of Warrant issued in connection with the Securities
Purchase Agreement forming Exhibit 10.52.(1) |
|
4 |
.14 |
|
Form of Warrant issued to placement agent in connection with the
Securities Purchase Agreement forming Exhibit 10.52.(1) |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
|
10 |
.52 |
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among the Registrant and
the investors named therein dated as of September 7,
2005.(1) |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Greenberg Traurig, LLP (contained in Exhibit 5.1) |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP(2) |
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney of Directors and Executive Officers (included
on the Signature Page of the Registration Statement)(2) |
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on September 13, 2005. |
|
|
(2) |
Previously filed. |
|
II-6
exv5w1
EXHIBIT 5.1
January 9,
2006
Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation
2100 Roosevelt Avenue
Springfield, Massachusetts 01104
|
|
|
Re: |
|
Registration Statement on Form S-3
Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation |
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as legal counsel to Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation, a Nevada corporation
(the Company), in connection with the Registration Statement on Form S-3 described herein (the
Registration Statement), to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission) on or about December 22, 2005 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The
Registration Statement relates to the resale of 6,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock, par
value $0.001 per share (the Shares) and 1,320,000 shares of the Companys common stock issuable
upon the exercise of warrants (the Warrant Shares). The Shares and, upon issuance, the Warrant
Shares may be sold from time to time by certain of the Companys stockholders (the Selling
Stockholders).
With respect to the opinion set forth below, we have examined originals, certified copies, or
copies otherwise identified to our satisfaction as being true copies, of the Registration Statement
and such other corporate records of the Company, agreements and other instruments, and certificates
of public officials and officers of the Company, as we have deemed necessary as a basis for the
opinion hereinafter expressed. As to various questions of fact material to such opinions, we have,
where relevant facts were not independently established, relied upon statements of officers of the
Company.
Based solely upon the foregoing, and upon our examination of such questions of law and
statutes as we have considered necessary or appropriate, and subject to the assumptions,
qualifications, limitations, and exceptions set forth herein, we are of the opinion that (a) the
Shares and the Warrant Shares have been lawfully and duly authorized, (b) the Shares have been
validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable, and (c) the Warrant Shares, when issued upon
exercise in accordance with the respective warrants, will be validly issued, fully paid, and
nonassessable.
We express no opinion as to the applicability or effect of any laws, orders, or judgments of
any state or other jurisdiction other than federal securities laws and the laws of the
state of Nevada. Further, our opinion is based solely upon existing laws, rules, and regulations,
and we undertake no obligation to advise you of any changes that may be brought to our attention
after the date hereof.
We hereby expressly consent to any reference to our firm in the Registration Statement, to the
inclusion of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, and to the filing of this
opinion with any other appropriate governmental agency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very truly yours,
|
|
|
/s/ Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | Attorneys at Law | 2375 East Camelback Road, Suite 700 | Phoenix, Arizona 85016 | Tel. 602.445.8000 | Fax 602.445.8100
|
ALBANY |
|
AMSTERDAM |
|
ATLANTA |
|
BOCA RATON |
|
BOSTON |
|
CHICAGO |
|
DALLAS |
|
DELAWARE |
|
DENVER |
|
FORT LAUDERDALE |
|
LOS ANGELES |
|
MIAMI |
|
NEW JERSEY |
|
NEW YORK |
|
ORANGE COUNTY, CA |
|
ORLANDO |
|
SILICON VALLEY |
|
PHILADELPHIA |
|
PHOENIX |
|
TALLAHASSEE |
|
TYSONS CORNER |
|
WASHINGTON, D.C. |
|
WEST PALM BEACH |
|
ZURICH |
|
www.gtlaw.com |
cover
January 9,
2006
VIA
FEDERAL EXPRESS AND EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Mail Stop 7010
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attention:
Lesli Sheppard
|
|
|
Re: |
|
Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation
Registration Statement on Form S-3
Filed on October 4, 2005
File No. 333-130634
|
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We express our appreciation for your comments on the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of
Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the Company). On behalf of the
Company, we are responding to comments on the Registration Statement provided by the staff (the
Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission by
letter dated January 6, 2006.
In
conjunction with these responses, the Company is filing Amendment No.
1 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 via EDGAR.
The Companys responses to the Staffs comments are indicated below, directly following a
restatement of each comment in bold, italicized type. To further facilitate the Staffs review,
the enclosed courtesy copies of Amendment No. 1 have been marked in the margins to indicate the
location of revisions made in response to the corresponding comment numbers.
1. |
|
SEC Comment: Risk Factors, page 3. We are currently involved in numerous
lawsuits, page 3. We note your response to comment 7 in our
letter dated November 1, 2005 and your revised disclosure in the
last sentence of the first paragraph of this risk factor. Please
revise further to clarify the risk and explain what impact this would
have on your company. |
|
|
|
Company
Response: The risk factor has been amended to clarify the
risk to and its impact on the Company.
|
|
2. |
|
We face risks associated with international trade and
currency exchange, page 8. We note your response to
comment 9 in our letter dated November 1, 2005. Please tell
us the names of the 50 countries where you sell your products.
We may have further comment based on your response. |
|
|
|
Company Response: Schedule A to this letter sets forth the countries in
which the Company sells its products. The risk factor has been
expanded to disclose the governmental approvals required for such
sales. |
|
3. |
|
We are subject to national events, page 9. We note
your response to comment 6 in our letter dated November 1, 2005.
Please revise to clarify the risk that your company faces. Your
disclosure here appears to focus primarily on the increased demand
you have experienced since September 11, 2001. |
|
|
|
Company Response: The risk factor has been amended to show the risks that
the Company faces. |
|
4. |
|
Exhibit
5.1 Legal Opinion Please have counsel revise to delete the term
substantive in the first sentence of the second to last
paragraph. |
|
|
|
Company Response: The legal opinion has
been revised as requested. |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | Attorneys at Law | 2375 East Camelback Road, Suite 700 | Phoenix, Arizona 85016 | Tel. 602.445.8000 | Fax 602.445.8100
|
ALBANY |
|
AMSTERDAM |
|
ATLANTA |
|
BOCA RATON |
|
BOSTON |
|
CHICAGO |
|
DALLAS |
|
DELAWARE |
|
DENVER |
|
FORT LAUDERDALE |
|
HOUSTON |
|
LAS VEGAS |
|
LOS ANGELES |
|
MIAMI |
|
NEW JERSEY |
|
NEW YORK |
|
ORANGE COUNTY, CA |
|
ORLANDO |
|
SACRAMENTO |
|
SILICON VALLEY |
|
PHILADELPHIA |
|
PHOENIX |
|
TALLAHASSEE |
|
TOKYO |
|
TYSONS CORNER |
|
WASHINGTON, D.C. |
|
WEST PALM BEACH |
|
ZURICH |
|
www.gtlaw.com |
The Company acknowledges your references regarding requests for acceleration of a
registration statement, including Rules 460 and 461. The Company will include the requested
acknowledgments and will endeavor to provide the Staff with adequate time after the filing of any
amendment for further review before submitting a request for acceleration and provide any
acceleration request at least two business days in advance of the requested effective date.
Your prompt attention to the enclosed is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions
regarding this filing or the Companys responses, please do not hesitate to contact me at (602)
445-8302 or Elizabeth Fraser of our office at (602) 445-8320.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
/s/ Robert S. Kant
|
|
|
Robert S. Kant |
|
|
For the Firm |
|
|
Enclosures
|
|
|
cc: |
|
Michael Golden, Smith & Wesson |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
SCHEDULE
A
Smith
& Wesson
International Customers
Fiscal Year ended April 30, 2005
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belgium
Bolivia
Bosnia/Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Canada
Chile
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Equador
Finland
France
Germany
Great Britain
Greece
Hong Kong
Israel
Italy
Japan
Jordan
Kuwait
Lebanon
Mexico
Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand
Norway
Oman
Philippines
Poland
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Trinidad
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
Uruguay